Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) payments in Logan County, Oklahoma totaled $569 from 1995-2020‡.
States Receiving Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) payments, 1995-2020‡
| Rank | State | Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) 1995-2020‡ | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | $3,482,899 | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| 2 | California | $3,299,066 | 3.8% | 7.8% |
| 3 | Mississippi | $2,763,487 | 3.2% | 11.0% |
| 4 | South Carolina | $2,735,522 | 3.1% | 14.1% |
| 5 | Missouri | $2,610,030 | 3.0% | 17.1% |
| 6 | Alabama | $2,387,621 | 2.7% | 19.9% |
| 7 | Colorado | $2,338,703 | 2.7% | 22.6% |
| 8 | Kansas | $2,323,675 | 2.7% | 25.3% |
| 9 | Tennessee | $2,308,033 | 2.7% | 27.9% |
| 10 | Arkansas | $2,249,923 | 2.6% | 30.5% |
| 11 | Arizona | $2,200,572 | 2.5% | 33.0% |
| 12 | Oregon | $2,186,453 | 2.5% | 35.6% |
| 13 | Minnesota | $2,176,312 | 2.5% | 38.1% |
| 14 | South Dakota | $2,133,429 | 2.5% | 40.5% |
| 15 | Iowa | $2,072,626 | 2.4% | 42.9% |
| 16 | Louisiana | $2,035,582 | 2.3% | 45.2% |
| 17 | Alaska | $1,958,190 | 2.3% | 47.5% |
| 18 | Georgia | $1,937,553 | 2.2% | 49.7% |
| 19 | West Virginia | $1,930,439 | 2.2% | 52.0% |
| 20 | Nebraska | $1,858,199 | 2.1% | 54.1% |
| 21 | Wisconsin | $1,819,646 | 2.1% | 56.2% |
| 22 | Idaho | $1,797,110 | 2.1% | 58.3% |
| 23 | Connecticut | $1,742,259 | 2.0% | 60.3% |
| 24 | Indiana | $1,730,905 | 2.0% | 62.3% |
| 25 | Massachusetts | $1,669,774 | 1.9% | 64.2% |
| 26 | Kentucky | $1,652,314 | 1.9% | 66.1% |
| 27 | Wyoming | $1,602,386 | 1.8% | 67.9% |
| 28 | Florida | $1,565,621 | 1.8% | 69.7% |
| 29 | Virginia | $1,519,134 | 1.7% | 71.5% |
| 30 | Oklahoma | $1,518,154 | 1.7% | 73.2% |
| 31 | Vermont | $1,509,844 | 1.7% | 75.0% |
| 32 | Michigan | $1,496,541 | 1.7% | 76.7% |
| 33 | North Dakota | $1,477,251 | 1.7% | 78.4% |
| 34 | New York | $1,450,482 | 1.7% | 80.1% |
| 35 | Montana | $1,416,548 | 1.6% | 81.7% |
| 36 | New Hampshire | $1,388,720 | 1.6% | 83.3% |
| 37 | Hawaii | $1,373,689 | 1.6% | 84.9% |
| 38 | Washington | $1,370,977 | 1.6% | 86.4% |
| 39 | Utah | $1,312,649 | 1.5% | 88.0% |
| 40 | Maine | $1,231,178 | 1.4% | 89.4% |
| 41 | Pennsylvania | $1,095,050 | 1.3% | 90.6% |
| 42 | Maryland | $1,053,213 | 1.2% | 91.8% |
| 43 | Ohio | $1,026,758 | 1.2% | 93.0% |
| 44 | North Carolina | $1,022,069 | 1.2% | 94.2% |
| 45 | New Jersey | $1,014,106 | 1.2% | 95.4% |
| 46 | New Mexico | $985,130 | 1.1% | 96.5% |
| 47 | Illinois | $955,862 | 1.1% | 97.6% |
| 48 | Rhode Island | $939,682 | 1.1% | 98.7% |
| 49 | Delaware | $845,148 | 1.0% | 99.7% |
| 50 | Nevada | $298,255 | 0.3% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf