Apple Subsidies in 18th District of California (Rep. Anna Eshoo) totaled $11,704 from 1995-2016.
Congressional Districts in 18th District of California (Rep. Anna Eshoo) Receiving apple subsidies, 1995-2016
| Rank |
District |
Apple Subsidies
1995-2016 | Pct of
Total | Running
Percentage |
| 1 | 9th District of California (Rep. Jerry McNerney) | $2,678,793 | 19.8% | 19.8% |
| 2 | 20th District of California (Rep. Jimmy Panetta) | $1,716,555 | 12.7% | 32.5% |
| 3 | 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) | $1,462,976 | 10.8% | 43.4% |
| 4 | 10th District of California (Rep. Jeff Denham) | $1,292,976 | 9.6% | 52.9% |
| 5 | 22nd District of California (Rep. Devin Nunes) | $1,196,407 | 8.9% | 61.8% |
| 6 | 21st District of California (Rep. David Valado) | $1,063,739 | 7.9% | 69.7% |
| 7 | 3rd District of California (Rep. John Garamendi) | $795,718 | 5.9% | 75.6% |
| 8 | 16th District of California (Rep. Jim Costa) | $719,671 | 5.3% | 80.9% |
| 9 | 23rd District of California (Rep. Kevin McCarthy) | $453,958 | 3.4% | 84.2% |
| 10 | 4th District of California (Rep. Tom McClintock) | $305,203 | 2.3% | 86.5% |
| 11 | 24th District of California (Rep. Salud Carbajal) | $195,676 | 1.4% | 87.9% |
| 12 | 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) | $149,402 | 1.1% | 89.1% |
| 13 | 15th District of California (Rep. Eric Swalwell) | $45,535 | 0.3% | 89.4% |
| 14 | 19th District of California (Rep. Zoe Lofgren) | $34,219 | 0.3% | 89.6% |
| 15 | 8th District of California (Rep. Paul Cook) | $32,420 | 0.2% | 89.9% |
| 16 | 6th District of California (Rep. Doris Matsui) | $30,365 | 0.2% | 90.1% |
| 17 | 18th District of California (Rep. Anna Eshoo) | $11,704 | 0.1% | 90.2% |
| 18 | 11th District of California (Rep. Mark DeSaulnier) | $1,660 | 0.0% | 90.2% |
| 19 | 5th District of California (Rep. Mike Thompson) | $564 | 0.0% | 90.2% |
| 20 | 52nd District of California (Rep. Scott Peters) | $268 | 0.0% | 90.2% |
| 21 | 31st District of California (Rep. Pete Anguilar) | $74 | 0.0% | 90.2% |
NOTE: Not all recipients were able to be placed into Congressional Districts
so the District total may not total 100%. Nationally 96% of all program monies were designated into a Congressional District
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Less Farm Pollution, More Clean Water
'Retired' Sensitive Cropland: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow
Growing Organic
Feeding the World
Exposing Fields of Filth
Crop Insurance