Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) payments in 5th District of Oklahoma (Rep. Steve Russell) totaled $0 in 2010

States Receiving Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) payments, 2010

Rank State Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP)
2010
Pct of
Total
Running
Percentage
1Texas$371,9527.6%7.6%
2Tennessee$331,7136.8%14.4%
3West Virginia$314,1806.4%20.8%
4Arizona$308,5756.3%27.1%
5New Mexico$222,0464.5%31.6%
6Louisiana$178,7013.6%35.3%
7Vermont$176,0823.6%38.9%
8Kansas$165,8453.4%42.2%
9Alaska$164,4903.4%45.6%
10Pennsylvania$161,5993.3%48.9%
11Iowa$141,7252.9%51.8%
12New Jersey$129,5132.6%54.4%
13Alabama$129,4282.6%57.1%
14Maine$123,2792.5%59.6%
15Oregon$122,9752.5%62.1%
16Wisconsin$121,4012.5%64.6%
17Virginia$118,4922.4%67.0%
18Connecticut$110,9182.3%69.3%
19South Carolina$109,8592.2%71.5%
20New York$106,5092.2%73.7%
21Arkansas$105,3762.2%75.8%
22Minnesota$101,5602.1%77.9%
23Montana$84,4661.7%79.6%
24South Dakota$75,5031.5%81.2%
25Massachusetts$68,0401.4%82.6%
26Michigan$67,5611.4%83.9%
27Georgia$67,0251.4%85.3%
28Washington$66,6491.4%86.7%
29Ohio$65,7391.3%88.0%
30Mississippi$64,6431.3%89.3%
31North Dakota$63,5631.3%90.6%
32Oklahoma$56,6111.2%91.8%
33Florida$47,2721.0%92.8%
34Wyoming$46,4800.9%93.7%
35North Carolina$44,7360.9%94.6%
36Idaho$43,8280.9%95.5%
37Illinois$37,7040.8%96.3%
38California$36,7950.8%97.0%
39New Hampshire$34,1390.7%97.7%
40Missouri$28,5930.6%98.3%
41Indiana$22,3850.5%98.8%
42Maryland$17,5990.4%99.1%
43Colorado$15,2210.3%99.4%
44Nebraska$15,1640.3%99.7%
45Kentucky$6,2320.1%99.9%
46Utah$4,7320.1%100.0%
47Rhode Island$1,2160.0%100.0%
48Hawaii$2170.0%100.0%

Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag