Non-insured Disaster Assistance in the United States, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 18,176
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in the United States totaled $222,572,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Carpenter Produce | Grady, AR 71644 | $1,580,422 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $846,973 |
3 | Ute Mountain Ute Farm & Ranch Ent | Towaoc, CO 81334 | $828,619 |
4 | Robert C & Kenneth C Yirsa | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $597,811 |
5 | Aaron Belcher Organic LLC | Melrose, NM 88124 | $527,271 |
6 | Arapahoe Ranch | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $413,230 |
7 | Sand Land Farms Inc | Leachville, AR 72438 | $406,329 |
8 | Courtney Farms LLC | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $400,775 |
9 | Summertime Produce LLC | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $396,008 |
10 | Knapp Land & Cattle LLC | Rocky Ford, CO 81067 | $384,983 |
11 | Lindskov Ranch Gen Ptr | Isabel, SD 57633 | $375,170 |
12 | Occ-o'connor Crops & Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $371,639 |
13 | Gardner Farms | Rocky Ford, CO 81067 | $365,062 |
14 | Cottle Farms Inc | Faison, NC 28341 | $354,791 |
15 | Woods Farms Inc | Broadview, NM 88112 | $346,743 |
16 | Sj Brandon LLC | Dundas, VA 23938 | $345,460 |
17 | Mcdonnell's Farm | Quinn, SD 57775 | $312,706 |
18 | 23 Farms LLC | Newberry, FL 32669 | $311,580 |
19 | Prukop Farms | Premont, TX 78375 | $306,328 |
20 | Gunner A Lishman | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $300,638 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>