Livestock Forage Disaster Program in the United States, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 147,824
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in the United States totaled $1,616,000,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Miller Ranch | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $308,991 |
22 | Circle M 8 Land & Cattle | Salado, TX 76571 | $308,489 |
23 | Cowan Ranch Partnership | Highmore, SD 57345 | $308,333 |
24 | Beanland Farms | Hollis, OK 73550 | $302,355 |
25 | Radcliff Farms | Forgan, OK 73938 | $298,735 |
26 | Oklahoma Ag Credit ** | Watonga, OK 73772 | $289,177 |
27 | 3-b Cattle Co | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $284,919 |
28 | Mckenzie Land & Livestock Company | Encino, NM 88321 | $266,514 |
29 | Ketscher Cattle Co | Hines, OR 97738 | $264,919 |
30 | Krebs Sheep Company | Ione, OR 97843 | $260,632 |
31 | Singleton Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $258,522 |
32 | Bank Forward ** | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $256,289 |
33 | Oneill Cattle Company | Columbus, NE 68602 | $251,579 |
34 | Foster Land & Cattle Brad Foster Gen Ptr | Ririe, ID 83443 | $246,600 |
35 | Weinreis Brothers | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $245,114 |
36 | Hardzog Farms | Elgin, OK 73538 | $242,811 |
37 | F & F Cattle Company | Mosquero, NM 87733 | $240,350 |
38 | Haskell Farms Partnership | Haskell, TX 79521 | $239,274 |
39 | Fagundes Fagundes Fagundes | Merced, CA 95348 | $235,887 |
40 | J & S Joint Venture | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $235,751 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”