Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in the United States, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,812
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in the United States totaled $76,588,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brandon Lee Moore | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $243,527 |
22 | Park Livestock Co Inc | Topaz, CA 96133 | $243,109 |
23 | Bair Bros. Sheep Co. LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $239,633 |
24 | James H Bourne III | Pioche, NV 89043 | $239,373 |
25 | Olson Farms Inc | Hershey, NE 69143 | $221,561 |
26 | Wickstrum Farms Inc | Westmoreland, KS 66549 | $216,660 |
27 | Miller-mathews Partnership | Midland, SD 57552 | $215,052 |
28 | James Mark French | Malta, MT 59538 | $206,679 |
29 | Scott Olsen Sheep | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $205,590 |
30 | Doug Korth | Randolph, NE 68771 | $203,507 |
31 | R N Fulstone Co | Smith, NV 89430 | $200,029 |
32 | Fredco, Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $199,649 |
33 | Thousand Peaks Ranches Inc | Salt Lake City, UT 84105 | $197,446 |
34 | Fredrick J Berger | Mandan, ND 58554 | $194,985 |
35 | Loxterkamp Farms III LLC | Swanville, MN 56382 | $190,045 |
36 | Klingenberg Farms Inc | Peabody, KS 66866 | $189,196 |
37 | Sinte Gleska University | Mission, SD 57555 | $185,079 |
38 | Kto Inc | Hershey, NE 69143 | $178,606 |
39 | Esda Inc | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $172,806 |
40 | , | $171,825 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”