Non-insured Disaster Assistance in the United States, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 18,176
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in the United States totaled $222,572,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $297,532 | |
22 | Miller-mathews Partnership | Midland, SD 57552 | $293,616 |
23 | Frankie's Produce Farms Inc | Florida, NY 10921 | $288,338 |
24 | Pioneer King Produce Inc | Pine Island, NY 10969 | $288,106 |
25 | Del Valle Fresh Inc Sc | Woodruff, SC 29388 | $282,901 |
26 | Michael Wilkerson | Trenton, FL 32693 | $282,900 |
27 | Rick F Duncan | Lake Village, IN 46349 | $282,900 |
28 | Demaio Farms And Ranches Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $282,900 |
29 | Pleasant Pastures Inc | Melrose, NM 88124 | $282,900 |
30 | Running M Land & Cattle Inc | Clovis, NM 88101 | $282,900 |
31 | Satur Farms, LLC | Cutchogue, NY 11935 | $282,900 |
32 | Urban Tropical Inc | Lakeland, FL 33810 | $282,900 |
33 | Snake Creek Farms | Hillsville, VA 24343 | $282,900 |
34 | Spina Farms LLC | Salem, NJ 08079 | $282,900 |
35 | Flowers By Kona Scent Da Smallest LLC | Ocean View, HI 96737 | $282,900 |
36 | Simpson Jr Farm LLC | Trenton, FL 32693 | $282,900 |
37 | Dionisio Produce And Farms LLC | Pueblo, CO 81006 | $282,900 |
38 | Zrh Farms LLC | Pedricktown, NJ 08067 | $282,900 |
39 | R & S Berry's Naylor LLC | Valdosta, GA 31606 | $282,900 |
40 | Sernak Farms Inc | Weatherly, PA 18255 | $282,900 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”