Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 221 to 240 of 846,235

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in the United States totaled $17,872,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
221Peterson Farms PartnershipBertrand, NE 68927$874,054
222Clawson Land PartnershipPlains, KS 67869$872,513
223Farmop Capital, LLC **St Paul, MN 55101$870,002
224Kroeplin Farms General PartnershipHighmore, SD 57345$869,820
225D L Robey FarmsAdairville, KY 42202$869,264
226Balmoral Farming PartnershipNewellton, LA 71357$868,933
227Son-d-partnershipAdrian, MN 56110$868,550
228Red Gum Planting Co No 2Ferriday, LA 71334$867,662
229Hanchera FarmsDanbury, NE 69026$867,059
230Lichtenbarger FarmsSouth Bend, IN 46628$865,003
231C & R FarmsImperial, NE 69033$861,967
232Dirks FarmsCimarron, KS 67835$861,384
233Alfs Farms PartnershipShickley, NE 68436$860,878
234Charles And Ann Garnett FarmsHopkinsville, KY 42240$859,726
235Kenny Brothers Farm PartnershipMerrill, MI 48637$856,379
236Minnaert Farms PartnershipGeneseo, IL 61254$855,686
237Revolution Farming PartnershipHolyoke, CO 80734$855,629
238Fernwood Ranch Joint VentureWalla Walla, WA 99362$854,697
239Flick Farm PartnershipBowdon, ND 58418$854,602
240Rlg FarmsOregon, IL 61061$854,052

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag