Farm Subsidy information
The United States
Total Subsidies in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 361 to 380 of 4,517,921
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in the United States totaled $522,685,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
361 | Mcmillan Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $9,796,248 |
362 | Vardeman Farms Ptnship | Slaton, TX 79364 | $9,793,258 |
363 | Mvp Farms Gp | Newton, GA 39870 | $9,777,016 |
364 | Cross Keys Bank ** | Rayville, LA 71269 | $9,771,272 |
365 | Bank Of Commerce ** | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $9,759,423 |
366 | Danielski Harvesting & Farming | Valentine, NE 69201 | $9,758,305 |
367 | Harbach Family Partnership | Warren, IL 61087 | $9,749,016 |
368 | Sellmeyer Farms Joint Venture | Knobel, AR 72435 | $9,735,919 |
369 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $9,724,280 |
370 | A-bar Ag Enterprises | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $9,683,519 |
371 | Titan Swine | Ireton, IA 51027 | $9,673,794 |
372 | Horse Creek Farms | Springfield, CO 81073 | $9,662,533 |
373 | Wada Farms Partnership | Pingree, ID 83262 | $9,651,528 |
374 | Fogleman Farms No 2 | Marion, AR 72364 | $9,645,016 |
375 | Riverfield Farms | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $9,624,879 |
376 | South Georgia Banking Company ** | Ashburn, GA 31714 | $9,619,546 |
377 | Rome Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $9,591,132 |
378 | H R W Farm Partnership | Friend, NE 68359 | $9,583,723 |
379 | Leake Farms | Newellton, LA 71357 | $9,577,073 |
380 | King Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $9,551,119 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”