Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 171,510
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in the United States totaled $384,768,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John Deck | Monroe, WA 98272 | $61,908 |
42 | Turnell Cattle Co | Meeteetse, WY 82433 | $61,817 |
43 | James H Burnett | Red Lodge, MT 59068 | $60,382 |
44 | Northern Cheyenne Tribe | Lame Deer, MT 59043 | $60,195 |
45 | Scholten Dairy Farm | Baldwinsville, NY 13027 | $60,153 |
46 | Stone Fred & Sandra | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $60,123 |
47 | Daley Farms Llp | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $59,500 |
48 | Larry Lee Brajkovich | New Bloomfield, PA 17068 | $59,047 |
49 | French Slough Ptnr | Snohomish, WA 98290 | $58,933 |
50 | Moore Company | Cary, MS 39054 | $58,615 |
51 | Dennis Ferland Dba Ferland Farm | Poland, ME 04274 | $58,308 |
52 | Harold Tyler Jr | Addison, ME 04606 | $58,264 |
53 | Fabers Riverbend Holsteins | Salem, OR 97304 | $57,600 |
54 | Andrews View Farm | Gouverneur, NY 13642 | $56,948 |
55 | Sunderland Farms Inc | Chester, UT 84623 | $56,737 |
56 | Dick Ledgerwood & Son Inc | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $56,484 |
57 | Bar V Bar Enterprises | Vernal, UT 84078 | $55,182 |
58 | Fairview Acres Dairy Farms Inc | Tillamook, OR 97141 | $54,947 |
59 | Barlow Farms Ptn | Nyssa, OR 97913 | $54,608 |
60 | Pellegrini Hillside Farm | Vulcan, MI 49892 | $53,432 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”