Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in the United States, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 174
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in the United States totaled $3,782,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | , | $31,168 | |
42 | Jay Sensmeier | Owensville, IN 47665 | $30,858 |
43 | Francis John Fleck | Kalamazoo, MI 49048 | $30,416 |
44 | Hall Brothers Farms Inc | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $27,668 |
45 | Dakota Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $27,172 |
46 | Larry D Ide | Lester Prairie, MN 55354 | $24,804 |
47 | Green Valley Farms | Columbia, NC 27925 | $24,560 |
48 | Paramount Ag Inc | Plainfield, WI 54966 | $23,669 |
49 | Rose Hill Farming Co Inc | Andalusia, AL 36420 | $20,515 |
50 | James L Jelinek | Alliance, NE 69301 | $19,971 |
51 | Ben Shelton Farms | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $19,569 |
52 | Stephen & Lynn Fincher Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $19,453 |
53 | Paragon Farms LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $19,389 |
54 | Steffel Farms LLC | Olivia, MN 56277 | $19,150 |
55 | Meadow View Farms Inc | Elizabethtown, KY 42701 | $18,925 |
56 | Weidenbach Bros | Monticello, MN 55362 | $18,469 |
57 | Gpr Farms, LLC | Miami, FL 33173 | $17,566 |
58 | Gregory Mitchell Layman | Sevierville, TN 37876 | $16,208 |
59 | Ronald Pichla | Brown City, MI 48416 | $16,140 |
60 | Nathan L Ide | Lester Prairie, MN 55354 | $14,934 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”