Livestock Forage Disaster Program in the United States, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 147,824
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in the United States totaled $1,616,000,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kay L Howard | Harlem, MT 59526 | $235,751 |
42 | Beachner Brothers Partnership | Saint Paul, KS 66771 | $235,750 |
43 | Ken Wixom | Blackfoot, ID 83221 | $235,750 |
44 | Frank C Shirts Jr | Wilder, ID 83676 | $235,750 |
45 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $235,750 |
46 | Sieben Ranch Co | Helena, MT 59624 | $235,750 |
47 | Boucher Ranch Inc | Hinsdale, MT 59241 | $235,750 |
48 | Page Land & Cattle Lllp | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $235,750 |
49 | Deerfield Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $235,750 |
50 | Salmon Falls Land And Livestock Co Inc | Hagerman, ID 83332 | $235,750 |
51 | Noh Sheep Company | Kimberly, ID 83341 | $235,750 |
52 | Vermillion Ranch Limited Partnership | Rock Springs, WY 82901 | $235,750 |
53 | Orchard Ranch, LLC | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $235,750 |
54 | Lyman Ranch Co | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $235,750 |
55 | J F Ranch Inc | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $235,750 |
56 | Schadler Ranch Inc | Adel, OR 97620 | $235,750 |
57 | Harder Hereford Ranch Inc | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $235,750 |
58 | White Ranch | Stowell, TX 77661 | $235,750 |
59 | Thatcher F Drummond | Pawhuska, OK 74056 | $235,750 |
60 | Jason And Tanya Brewer | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $235,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”