Non-insured Disaster Assistance in the United States, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 18,176
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in the United States totaled $222,572,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Douglas E Simpson III | Trenton, FL 32693 | $282,900 |
42 | Fair Weather Growers LLC | Rocky Hill, CT 06067 | $282,900 |
43 | Toluca Blackberries Inc | Lawndale, NC 28090 | $282,900 |
44 | Chasten L Courtney | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $282,900 |
45 | , | $282,900 | |
46 | , | $282,900 | |
47 | Bell A Grazing Coop | Burns, OR 97720 | $282,899 |
48 | Weinreis Brothers | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $282,581 |
49 | Jerry & Betty Swenson | Clovis, NM 88101 | $272,616 |
50 | Degon Family Farms Joint Venture | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $272,071 |
51 | Lusk Farms LLC | Rocky Ford, CO 81067 | $268,234 |
52 | Tony Morgan Farms Inc | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $268,024 |
53 | Broken Circle Company | Hines, OR 97738 | $265,030 |
54 | Toby Bostwick | Melrose, NM 88124 | $262,884 |
55 | , | $262,630 | |
56 | Sunrise Tropicals Inc | Lakeland, FL 33809 | $262,610 |
57 | Brightly Farms, LLC | Hamlin, NY 14464 | $254,429 |
58 | H J Hammond Ranch Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $250,617 |
59 | Mill Point Aquaculture | Sealevel, NC 28577 | $248,774 |
60 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $246,818 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”