Farm Subsidy information
The United States
Total Subsidies in the United States, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 740,340
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in the United States totaled $20,489,000,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gulf States Aquaculture LLC | Palacios, TX 77465 | $1,535,738 |
42 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $1,531,851 |
43 | Joseph A Warren III | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $1,528,197 |
44 | , | $1,519,893 | |
45 | Mac Enterprises | Modesto, CA 95358 | $1,489,653 |
46 | Walker Farms | Nicholls, GA 31554 | $1,451,731 |
47 | Burnam Berry Farms LLC | Nicholls, GA 31554 | $1,450,342 |
48 | Eastco Gp | Brewster, WA 98812 | $1,439,300 |
49 | Richland Prtsp | Salix, IA 51052 | $1,420,640 |
50 | Jenks Family Farms | Monmouth, IL 61462 | $1,417,178 |
51 | Corbitt Family Farms LLC | Felda, FL 33930 | $1,414,588 |
52 | Plantation Creek LLC | Palm City, FL 34991 | $1,412,386 |
53 | East Beach Oyster Company LLC | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $1,402,191 |
54 | Ridgeline Farms Inc | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,388,894 |
55 | Cosi Farms, LLC | Madras, OR 97741 | $1,375,000 |
56 | J & J Bee Service Inc | Kalamazoo, MI 49004 | $1,359,255 |
57 | , | $1,340,011 | |
58 | Shoshone Bannock Tribe | Fort Hall, ID 83203 | $1,332,322 |
59 | Enowski Farms Inc | Olean, MO 65064 | $1,301,092 |
60 | Clawson Ranch Partnership | Plains, KS 67869 | $1,295,526 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”