Deficiency Payment in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 969,429
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in the United States totaled $3,056,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Schmidt Brothers Jv | Hallettsville, TX 77964 | $471,944 |
42 | Triple A Farming Co | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $470,582 |
43 | Fontenot And Fontenot | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $464,662 |
44 | Steele Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $458,944 |
45 | Cook Farms A Joint Venture | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $447,998 |
46 | Satterfield Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $447,310 |
47 | Murphy Bros | Chico, CA 95927 | $445,539 |
48 | Morgan Farms | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $438,036 |
49 | Bain Farms | Bunkie, LA 71322 | $436,344 |
50 | Dollins Farm Partnership | Katy, TX 77492 | $429,344 |
51 | Rytone Family Partnership | Chico, CA 95928 | $429,180 |
52 | Aguzzi Farms A Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $428,025 |
53 | Bowman Farms Ptnr | Newport, AR 72112 | $422,012 |
54 | Yuba Farming Co | Woodland, CA 95776 | $418,538 |
55 | Harold Peltier & Sons Jv | Danbury, TX 77534 | $416,680 |
56 | Riverside Farms | Wynne, AR 72396 | $413,020 |
57 | Southam Joint Venture | Butte City, CA 95920 | $412,347 |
58 | Kellick Farming Co | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $411,432 |
59 | Six Way Farms Ptnrs | Weiner, AR 72479 | $409,575 |
60 | Franklin Partnership | Rayville, LA 71269 | $409,350 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”