Total Disaster Programs in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,860,260
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in the United States totaled $55,693,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Imperial Tropicals | Lakeland, FL 33805 | $4,211,276 |
42 | Neal Cattle Company,llc | Purcell, OK 73080 | $4,208,868 |
43 | Durrett Farms | Amarillo, TX 79102 | $4,188,299 |
44 | Reimers General Partnership | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $4,157,972 |
45 | P G C Farms | Brinson, GA 39825 | $4,099,165 |
46 | Smith & Sons | Bishop, TX 78343 | $4,090,900 |
47 | Attebury Grain Co | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $4,086,612 |
48 | Beanland Farms | Hollis, OK 73550 | $3,982,077 |
49 | Walker Place | Danville, IL 61832 | $3,966,448 |
50 | Wakefield Pork Inc | Gaylord, MN 55334 | $3,884,424 |
51 | David Britz Linda Britz Glassman & Martin Britz Pt | Fresno, CA 93790 | $3,849,808 |
52 | Johnson Farms | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $3,835,464 |
53 | Suncure Farms | Burlington, CO 80807 | $3,822,196 |
54 | Gulf States Aquaculture LLC | Palacios, TX 77465 | $3,816,517 |
55 | Modesto Reservoir Ranch | Hughson, CA 95326 | $3,811,198 |
56 | Richard & Susen Hewitson Jv | Avenal, CA 93204 | $3,793,775 |
57 | Marley & Whitney | Roswell, NM 88202 | $3,787,325 |
58 | Mark Ryan Kubecka | Palacios, TX 77465 | $3,716,236 |
59 | 3-s Jv | Munday, TX 76371 | $3,679,039 |
60 | Arapahoe Ranch | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $3,568,154 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”