Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in the United States, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 5,812
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in the United States totaled $76,588,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Shepperson Ranch | Midwest, WY 82643 | $141,532 |
62 | Daniel L Schilling | Wessington, SD 57381 | $141,273 |
63 | Wade Kopren | Bison, SD 57620 | $140,616 |
64 | Bradley Leonard | Bison, SD 57620 | $140,377 |
65 | Egbert Livestock LLC | Wells, NV 89835 | $139,960 |
66 | Eric J Iversen | White River, SD 57579 | $139,469 |
67 | Todd Dykstra | Wayland, MI 49348 | $139,298 |
68 | Wilbur Reid | Poplar, MT 59255 | $139,138 |
69 | Reigle Cattle Co LLC | Madison, NE 68748 | $138,845 |
70 | Clarence Archibald | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $134,706 |
71 | Lower Brule Farm Corp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $129,645 |
72 | David Joseph Plass | Bird Island, MN 55310 | $129,183 |
73 | Eagle Ridge Feed Lot Inc | Beemer, NE 68716 | $126,037 |
74 | S Diamond Ranch LLC | Rawlins, WY 82301 | $125,948 |
75 | Brian Ty Nicholls | Kinnear, WY 82516 | $125,841 |
76 | Ace Land & Livestock LLC | Fruit Heights, UT 84037 | $125,118 |
77 | Les Baumgartner Inc | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $123,588 |
78 | White Sands Enterprises LLC | Saint Anthony, ID 83445 | $121,585 |
79 | Gtw Inc | Lodge Grass, MT 59050 | $119,770 |
80 | Kenneth A Kohlhof | Dannebrog, NE 68831 | $119,715 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”