Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 846,235
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in the United States totaled $17,872,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Moon Island Farms Partnership | Lowell, IN 46356 | $1,467,760 |
62 | Farm Credit Midsouth Pca ** | Barton, AR 72312 | $1,466,813 |
63 | Rome Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $1,463,225 |
64 | Love & Love Farms | Montezuma, KS 67867 | $1,440,006 |
65 | Danielski Harvesting & Farming | Valentine, NE 69201 | $1,417,262 |
66 | Hoverson Brothers | Larimore, ND 58251 | $1,406,626 |
67 | Berrybrook Enterprises | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $1,397,706 |
68 | Stromberger & Sons Partnership | Imperial, NE 69033 | $1,371,319 |
69 | Moore Brothers | Sunray, TX 79086 | $1,370,348 |
70 | Hatcher Land & Cattle Co | Liberal, KS 67901 | $1,359,797 |
71 | Wheatlife Farms Gp | Colfax, WA 99111 | $1,352,648 |
72 | Greenview Farms | De Witt, IA 52742 | $1,349,407 |
73 | Lewis Wheeler & Lee Wheeler L & L Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $1,344,288 |
74 | Merna Valley Ag | Merna, NE 68856 | $1,334,536 |
75 | Whiskey Creek Ptn | Lawton, IA 51030 | $1,326,075 |
76 | Oberg Farms Prtshp | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $1,316,329 |
77 | Ebert Farms | Kinsley, KS 67547 | $1,312,293 |
78 | Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma ** | Clinton, OK 73601 | $1,303,996 |
79 | Mull Family Farms Operating Ptnshp | Pawnee Rock, KS 67567 | $1,286,921 |
80 | Smith Family Farms Gp | Rochester, IN 46975 | $1,263,371 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”