Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in the United States, 2022

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 88,039

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in the United States totaled $901,973,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
2022
61Levin J & Lolita B SavoyChurch Point, LA 70525$394,166
62Cowan Ranch PartnershipHighmore, SD 57345$393,643
63, $391,058
64Dirk W OlsenAlbany, OR 97321$390,826
65Jeanne M HabeckMoorcroft, WY 82721$390,470
66H & R Crawfish, LLCLake Arthur, LA 70549$386,673
67Aaron OlivierArnaudville, LA 70512$373,436
68Chris M ToppingCedar Key, FL 32625$365,206
69Kenneth Ross Olivier FarmsArnaudville, LA 70512$361,642
70Bayou Land Farms General PartnershipWelsh, LA 70591$360,373
714t Cattle Company LLC Dba 4t Cattle & Land CompanyBluff Dale, TX 76433$359,682
72Rossman Apiaries LLCMoultrie, GA 31776$357,516
73Jrs Aquaculture Farm IncPalacios, TX 77465$353,877
74Christian CharlesCarrington, ND 58421$351,291
75Busenitz Land & Cattle IncHulett, WY 82720$350,680
76Cathy F HeinenBasile, LA 70515$348,719
77Aquatic Collectors Of Florida IncWimauma, FL 33598$348,499
78Sunshine Honey Bees LLCLecompte, LA 71346$342,289
79Mv Aquatics IncPlant City, FL 33565$340,922
80Mescalero Apache TribeMescalero, NM 88340$338,612

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag