Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in the United States, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 35,066
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in the United States totaled $191,193,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Carver Farms | Broxton, GA 31519 | $49,444 |
62 | Hamilton Farms | Hillsboro, AL 35643 | $49,427 |
63 | Gene Melton & Sons Ptn | Sulphur Rock, AR 72579 | $49,186 |
64 | Stuckey Farms Partnership | Clarkedale, AR 72325 | $48,320 |
65 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $48,275 |
66 | Tate Farms General Partnership | Meridianville, AL 35759 | $47,962 |
67 | Old Dixie Farms Partnership | Byromville, GA 31007 | $47,775 |
68 | Maple Pork Farms | Kokomo, IN 46901 | $47,500 |
69 | Curry Family Farm | Alpha, IL 61413 | $47,500 |
70 | Pederson Brothers Partnership | Bejou, MN 56516 | $47,500 |
71 | Kipping Farms | Carrollton, MO 64633 | $47,500 |
72 | Mcmillan Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $47,500 |
73 | River View Farms | Platte, SD 57369 | $47,500 |
74 | C J Farms Gen Ptnr | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $47,500 |
75 | P & J Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $47,500 |
76 | Moore Company | Cary, MS 39054 | $47,500 |
77 | B & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $47,500 |
78 | Berry Farm Enterprises | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $47,500 |
79 | G & G Farms No 2 | Shaw, MS 38773 | $47,500 |
80 | Agri Ventures | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $47,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”