Total Conservation Programs in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,398,976
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in the United States totaled $53,097,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sharpe Family Partnership | Lacey, WA 98516 | $3,293,402 |
62 | Smith Family Farms | Condon, OR 97823 | $3,293,371 |
63 | Horseheaven Farms | Mabton, WA 98935 | $3,229,204 |
64 | Wilton Earle & Sons | Craig, CO 81625 | $3,211,154 |
65 | Harris Ag | Malta, ID 83342 | $3,193,418 |
66 | Hartvigsen Brothers | Centerville, UT 84014 | $3,187,469 |
67 | J Hair Farms Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $3,173,936 |
68 | Grassl Farms | Pasco, WA 99301 | $3,161,215 |
69 | Miller Ranch | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $3,157,377 |
70 | St John River Water Management Di | Palatka, FL 32178 | $3,119,676 |
71 | Colorado Farms | Lake Ozark, MO 65049 | $3,106,170 |
72 | B And M Farms | Pagosa Springs, CO 81147 | $3,101,150 |
73 | S Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $3,090,827 |
74 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $3,068,775 |
75 | Mcarmour Enterprises Ptr | Halls, TN 38040 | $3,063,052 |
76 | Elm Creek Farms | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $3,047,513 |
77 | Galbreath Brothers Jv | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $3,044,621 |
78 | Judson Properties | Mesa, WA 99343 | $3,008,930 |
79 | Cardene Enterprises | Brigham City, UT 84302 | $2,934,921 |
80 | Konig Farms | Briggsdale, CO 80611 | $2,911,945 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”