Total Conservation Programs in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,398,976

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in the United States totaled $53,097,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
61Sharpe Family PartnershipLacey, WA 98516$3,293,402
62Smith Family FarmsCondon, OR 97823$3,293,371
63Horseheaven FarmsMabton, WA 98935$3,229,204
64Wilton Earle & SonsCraig, CO 81625$3,211,154
65Harris AgMalta, ID 83342$3,193,418
66Hartvigsen BrothersCenterville, UT 84014$3,187,469
67J Hair Farms PartnershipWalla Walla, WA 99362$3,173,936
68Grassl FarmsPasco, WA 99301$3,161,215
69Miller RanchHarlowton, MT 59036$3,157,377
70St John River Water Management DiPalatka, FL 32178$3,119,676
71Colorado FarmsLake Ozark, MO 65049$3,106,170
72B And M FarmsPagosa Springs, CO 81147$3,101,150
73S FarmsMiles City, MT 59301$3,090,827
74Northwest Farm Credit Service **Great Falls, MT 59405$3,068,775
75Mcarmour Enterprises PtrHalls, TN 38040$3,063,052
76Elm Creek FarmsSturgis, SD 57785$3,047,513
77Galbreath Brothers JvRitzville, WA 99169$3,044,621
78Judson PropertiesMesa, WA 99343$3,008,930
79Cardene EnterprisesBrigham City, UT 84302$2,934,921
80Konig FarmsBriggsdale, CO 80611$2,911,945

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag