Total Conservation Programs in the United States, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 323,262
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in the United States totaled $1,709,000,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Progressive Farms | Byers, CO 80103 | $167,370 |
62 | Farmers Bank Of Northern ** | Centerville, IA 52544 | $166,806 |
63 | Hippen Paradise Acres | Aplington, IA 50604 | $166,610 |
64 | Iowa Family Farms | Batavia, IA 52533 | $166,288 |
65 | Harris Ag | Malta, ID 83342 | $165,068 |
66 | Burning Butterfly Partnership | Boise, ID 83702 | $163,498 |
67 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $162,418 |
68 | Bremer Bank ** | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $160,722 |
69 | Lower Brule Sioux Tribe | Lower Brule, SD 57548 | $160,028 |
70 | First State Bank ** | Stuart, IA 50250 | $158,208 |
71 | Lake Charles Trees Partnership | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $157,615 |
72 | Blankenship Crp Joint Venture | Washtucna, WA 99371 | $156,312 |
73 | Alpine Five | Burlington, CO 80807 | $156,290 |
74 | L & S Bruce Family Partnership | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $155,467 |
75 | Delta Bank ** | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $151,745 |
76 | D & C Schulte Crp Partnership | Greeley, CO 80631 | $151,080 |
77 | J Hair Farms Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $150,867 |
78 | Foster Land & Cattle Brad Foster Gen Ptr | Ririe, ID 83443 | $150,734 |
79 | Farm Credit Of Ness City ** | Ness City, KS 67560 | $148,149 |
80 | Banner Bank ** | Yakima, WA 98902 | $146,277 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”