Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 171,510
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in the United States totaled $384,768,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Michael L Dorwin | Woodville, WI 54028 | $50,000 |
82 | Harold G Shafer | Summersville, MO 65571 | $50,000 |
83 | G Lorin Wilson | Alta, WY 83414 | $50,000 |
84 | James R Mullins | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $50,000 |
85 | David W Christopher | Richmond, TX 77469 | $49,999 |
86 | John Guynup | Langlois, OR 97450 | $49,998 |
87 | Christopher R Pedersen | Prosser, WA 99350 | $49,942 |
88 | Michelson Humbug Creek Ranch LLC | Reno, NV 89509 | $49,838 |
89 | Pittman Carey Jr | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $49,681 |
90 | Arthur B Cole | Meshoppen, PA 18630 | $49,541 |
91 | Argo Family Farms | Princeton, CA 95970 | $49,500 |
92 | Thousand Peaks Ranches Inc | Salt Lake City, UT 84105 | $49,258 |
93 | Bar-way Farm Inc | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $49,037 |
94 | Gary Wilson | Pinedale, WY 82941 | $48,915 |
95 | Miles Land & Livestock Co | Casper, WY 82604 | $48,838 |
96 | Harder Hereford Ranch Inc | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $48,786 |
97 | W T Waggoner Est Trust | Vernon, TX 76385 | $48,727 |
98 | Ikeda Bros. | Oceano, CA 93475 | $48,688 |
99 | Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe | Tokeland, WA 98590 | $48,444 |
100 | Thor Oechsner | Newfield, NY 14867 | $47,977 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”