Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in the United States, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 5,812
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in the United States totaled $76,588,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Geersen Ranch LLC | Martin, SD 57551 | $118,920 |
82 | Joseph B Mckitrick | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $118,835 |
83 | Jessy Mckee | Vernal, UT 84078 | $118,797 |
84 | Miller Land And Livestock Corporation | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $118,753 |
85 | Roger T Holthaus And Jolene M Holthaus Rev Trust | Seneca, KS 66538 | $117,485 |
86 | J D Morris | Algona, IA 50511 | $116,410 |
87 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $114,967 |
88 | Ritter Cattle LLC | Beemer, NE 68716 | $113,423 |
89 | Ritter Livestock LLC | Beemer, NE 68716 | $113,271 |
90 | Borda Land & Sheep Co LLC | Gardnerville, NV 89410 | $113,196 |
91 | , | $112,987 | |
92 | , | $112,672 | |
93 | Golden View Hutterian Brethren Inc | Salem, SD 57058 | $110,678 |
94 | Vch Ranch-fl LLC | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $110,266 |
95 | Berkner Family Farms LLC | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $110,174 |
96 | Mark Bontrager | Holton, KS 66436 | $109,856 |
97 | Kevin Rozeboom | Luverne, MN 56156 | $109,134 |
98 | Burdick Ranch Inc | Baker, MT 59313 | $108,465 |
99 | Denton Koehn | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $108,105 |
100 | , | $107,039 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”