CCC Organic Programs in the United States, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,220
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in the United States totaled $2,160,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Ivan Kranz | Burns, WY 82053 | $1,500 |
82 | Charles D Kennedy | Angie, LA 70426 | $1,500 |
83 | Leo J Seykora | Owatonna, MN 55060 | $1,500 |
84 | Michael J Brazil | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $1,500 |
85 | Miller Farm Inc | Vernon, VT 05354 | $1,500 |
86 | Pope Brothers Dairy LLC | Franklinton, LA 70438 | $1,500 |
87 | Jill A Smith - Pure Eire, LLC | Othello, WA 99344 | $1,500 |
88 | Mce Amos Inc | Santa Rosa, CA 95401 | $1,500 |
89 | Hoffman Family Farms Inc | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $1,500 |
90 | Eden Valley Organics LLC | Eden, NY 14057 | $1,500 |
91 | Radiance Dairy LLC | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $1,500 |
92 | Adam M Smith | Mapleton, IL 61547 | $1,500 |
93 | White Pine Valley LLC | River Falls, WI 54022 | $1,500 |
94 | Timothy James Christiansen | Penn Yan, NY 14527 | $1,500 |
95 | John Douglas Gorton | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $1,500 |
96 | Providence Farm LLC | Central Lake, MI 49622 | $1,500 |
97 | Peaches & Cream Organic Farms LLC | Boulder, CO 80301 | $1,500 |
98 | Golden Prairie Inc | Nunn, CO 80648 | $1,500 |
99 | Staehely Valley Veue Dairy LLC | Oregon City, OR 97045 | $1,500 |
100 | Eden Foods Inc | Clinton, MI 49236 | $1,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”