Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 787
Recipients of Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program from farms in the United States totaled $36,469,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rachel Deen Decsd | Bell Gardens, CA 90202 | $42,506 |
102 | Robinson Farms | Blythe, CA 92226 | $42,111 |
103 | Lueck Farming Co., Inc. | Litchfield Park, AZ 85340 | $40,266 |
104 | R S Garewal & Sons Inc | Holtville, CA 92250 | $39,241 |
105 | Harley Portwood Ranch | Seymour, TX 76380 | $38,594 |
106 | Riverview Land Company | Los Angeles, CA 90024 | $38,430 |
107 | Menvielle Ranches Inc | El Centro, CA 92243 | $38,344 |
108 | Edmund Ogaz | Garfield, NM 87936 | $38,280 |
109 | Melvin E & Virginia J Patterson I | Moreno Valley, CA 92557 | $37,933 |
110 | Fisher Ranch III | Blythe, CA 92225 | $37,298 |
111 | Massey Farms Inc Dba Massey Enterprises | Animas, NM 88020 | $36,480 |
112 | Carroll F Nilson Co | Holtville, CA 92250 | $36,387 |
113 | Montie R And Diana K Lee And | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $36,275 |
114 | Charles C Dessert Farms | El Centro, CA 92244 | $35,786 |
115 | Robert B & Don F Shank Gp | Brawley, CA 92227 | $35,726 |
116 | Carranza Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $35,617 |
117 | G Farms | El Mirage, AZ 85335 | $35,387 |
118 | P R P Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $35,141 |
119 | D Lamoreaux Farms II | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $34,493 |
120 | Cargill Turkey Products | Harrisonburg, VA 22801 | $34,443 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”