Grasslands Reserve Program in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 5,219
Recipients of Grasslands Reserve Program from farms in the United States totaled $216,404,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Grasslands Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Don C Hughes | Aline, OK 73716 | $395,408 |
102 | George Hay LLC | Portales, NM 88130 | $393,993 |
103 | Joe Netz | Lost Springs, WY 82224 | $384,105 |
104 | Campbell Livestock LLC | Shoshoni, WY 82649 | $381,135 |
105 | Mountain Valley Livestock Inc | Douglas, WY 82633 | $378,075 |
106 | Speake Ranch LLC | Springer, OK 73458 | $375,560 |
107 | Iv Bar Inc | Tucson, AZ 85718 | $374,571 |
108 | Chimney Canyon Grazing Assoc | Sterling, CO 80751 | $374,147 |
109 | Bear Creek Land & Cattle Company | West Yellowstone, MT 59758 | $372,672 |
110 | Melvin L Gimbel | Ree Heights, SD 57371 | $371,913 |
111 | James Headley | White Lake, SD 57383 | $371,069 |
112 | Clip Ranch Ltd | Goliad, TX 77963 | $369,424 |
113 | Duane T Shimogawa | Lawai, HI 96765 | $363,045 |
114 | Fromm Property Holdings Lllp | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $357,335 |
115 | Kevin D Halverson | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $354,199 |
116 | George Hay | Pep, NM 88126 | $350,216 |
117 | Slash T Cattle Co | Portales, NM 88130 | $347,040 |
118 | L R Martin Inc | Madera, CA 93636 | $346,618 |
119 | Lilian Arrington | Austin, TX 78741 | $339,920 |
120 | Secret Promise Ltd | Saint Petersburg, FL 33731 | $338,550 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”