Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 846,235

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in the United States totaled $17,872,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
101Reimers General PartnershipJamestown, ND 58401$1,162,463
102Alpine FiveBurlington, CO 80807$1,152,987
103Frontier Family FarmsAlbert Lea, MN 56007$1,149,008
104Stockman Bank **Conrad, MT 59425$1,148,982
105Farm Credit Services Of Nd **Dickinson, ND 58601$1,147,181
106North Star Community Credit Union **Maddock, ND 58348$1,143,398
107Bendickson Farms General PartnershipGarrison, ND 58540$1,136,845
108Mike Ogan Farms PartnershipPierre, SD 57501$1,135,465
109First South Farm Credit AcaOpelousas, LA 70571$1,122,185
110Drozd FarmsAllegan, MI 49010$1,121,667
111Scheinost FarmsPage, NE 68766$1,121,255
112Van Zuilen FarmsClaremont, MN 55924$1,112,865
113Pbp FarmsHurley, SD 57036$1,111,789
114Stoy FarmsAshley, IN 46705$1,110,881
115Regions Bank **Grenada, MS 38901$1,105,095
116Hamlin Farms PartnershipHugoton, KS 67951$1,095,632
117Simmons 1st National Bank **Lake Village, AR 71653$1,091,688
118Cott Family FarmsClay Center, KS 67432$1,084,149
119Agheritage **Brinkley, AR 72021$1,076,277
120Lower Brule Farm CorpFort Pierre, SD 57532$1,072,547

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag