Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 846,235
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in the United States totaled $17,872,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Reimers General Partnership | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $1,162,463 |
102 | Alpine Five | Burlington, CO 80807 | $1,152,987 |
103 | Frontier Family Farms | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $1,149,008 |
104 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $1,148,982 |
105 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $1,147,181 |
106 | North Star Community Credit Union ** | Maddock, ND 58348 | $1,143,398 |
107 | Bendickson Farms General Partnership | Garrison, ND 58540 | $1,136,845 |
108 | Mike Ogan Farms Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $1,135,465 |
109 | First South Farm Credit Aca | Opelousas, LA 70571 | $1,122,185 |
110 | Drozd Farms | Allegan, MI 49010 | $1,121,667 |
111 | Scheinost Farms | Page, NE 68766 | $1,121,255 |
112 | Van Zuilen Farms | Claremont, MN 55924 | $1,112,865 |
113 | Pbp Farms | Hurley, SD 57036 | $1,111,789 |
114 | Stoy Farms | Ashley, IN 46705 | $1,110,881 |
115 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $1,105,095 |
116 | Hamlin Farms Partnership | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $1,095,632 |
117 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $1,091,688 |
118 | Cott Family Farms | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $1,084,149 |
119 | Agheritage ** | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $1,076,277 |
120 | Lower Brule Farm Corp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,072,547 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”