Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in the United States, 2022

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 88,039

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in the United States totaled $901,973,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
2022
101Vermillion Ranch Limited PartnershipRock Springs, WY 82901$315,750
102Morein Farms PartnershipVille Platte, LA 70586$315,279
103Mark Mc CubbinsTouchet, WA 99360$315,151
104Page Land & Cattle LllpGlasgow, MT 59230$314,587
105Dro IncPlevna, MT 59344$314,540
106Laci H ByrneJennings, LA 70546$314,162
107Whetstone Valley Honey IncBrowns Valley, MN 56219$313,959
108Iberlin Farm PartnershipGillette, WY 82718$313,771
109R & J Cormier FarmsOpelousas, LA 70570$312,886
110Island District IncLemoore, CA 93245$310,685
111World Honey Market LLCSanderson, FL 32087$309,844
112Mclane Farms LLCJonesboro, IL 62952$309,696
113Henry C Vogler IvEly, NV 89301$308,255
11440 Mile Colony Ranch IncLodge Grass, MT 59050$308,077
115Roberts Bee CoJesup, GA 31545$307,017
116Thomas Cattle CompanyMurphy, ID 83650$305,815
117S & M HoneyDowney, ID 83234$303,886
118Wayne Tanner Tropical Fish IncWimauma, FL 33598$303,750
119Hunter K LuquetteAbbeville, LA 70510$303,310
120Miller Land And Livestock CorporationBig Piney, WY 83113$302,652

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag