Total Conservation Programs in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,398,976

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in the United States totaled $53,097,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
101Sac & Fox Tribe Of The Mississippi In IowaAmes, IA 50010$2,625,161
102Paint Rock Angus Ranch IncLavina, MT 59046$2,622,900
103B & T FarmsProsser, WA 99350$2,619,734
104Moore 2 Farms GpLacrosse, WA 99143$2,613,218
105Goetz Wheat Farms JvCoulee City, WA 99115$2,612,026
106Ward FarmsArbon, ID 83212$2,601,323
107Carol Beasley & Peggy Taylor Et ARiddleton, TN 37151$2,598,045
108Mrs N A Brown & SonsFriona, TX 79035$2,587,815
109Cline Clyde RanchVancouver, WA 98687$2,586,078
110Eastern Oregon Investment ManagementLa Grande, OR 97850$2,556,280
111Pearce Brothers JvWilson Creek, WA 98860$2,550,549
112Moore FarmsProsser, WA 99350$2,537,743
113Blankenship Crp Joint VentureRitzville, WA 99169$2,531,260
114Bellamy Aerial Spraying JvGoodland, KS 67735$2,524,275
115Rex & Kathy RushClovis, NM 88101$2,519,071
116Triple S FarmsNormandy Park, WA 98166$2,517,943
117Tom Davis Farms Joint VentureCoulee City, WA 99115$2,491,391
118J D Woodard & Sons PtrIdaho Falls, ID 83404$2,486,623
119Wiswall Ag PartnershipPasco, WA 99301$2,475,209
120Gary And Beverly LockmillerClovis, NM 88101$2,466,988

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag