Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 846,235

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in the United States totaled $17,872,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
121Trail PartnershipWidener, AR 72394$1,071,973
122Murdoch PartnershipOrleans, NE 68966$1,070,739
123Ag-credit Aca **Mount Gilead, OH 43338$1,069,427
124Groco Family FarmsJamestown, OH 45335$1,057,040
125Dejay FarmsRuthven, IA 51358$1,054,964
126Northwest Farm Credit Service **Great Falls, MT 59405$1,053,546
127Larson Grain FarmsMaple Park, IL 60151$1,047,138
128Aden Diversified Ag PartnershipGothenburg, NE 69138$1,045,917
129Bornitz FarmsCarthage, SD 57323$1,039,940
130Pinicon FarmMc Intire, IA 50455$1,036,880
131C J Farms Gen PtnrHoldrege, NE 68949$1,032,509
132Aberle FarmsMenoken, ND 58558$1,029,366
133Kent Family Farm PartnershipWinslow, IL 61089$1,027,100
134Country Cruzin'Yuma, CO 80759$1,026,598
135Howell FarmsPinetown, NC 27865$1,025,612
136State Line FarmsLyons, OH 43533$1,025,598
137Jcs Family FarmsIowa City, IA 52240$1,025,050
138Klc FarmSatanta, KS 67870$1,023,603
139Wayne & Brent Clark PtnshipDumas, TX 79029$1,022,120
140Three B Farms PartnershipGettysburg, SD 57442$1,019,431

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag