Total Disaster Programs in the United States, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 358,782
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in the United States totaled $5,276,000,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Tom Gates | Culver, OR 97734 | $893,843 |
122 | Arthur Kunde And Sons Inc | Kenwood, CA 95452 | $893,600 |
123 | Davis Enterprises Inc | Avon Park, FL 33825 | $891,909 |
124 | Acosta Ranch, Inc | Hickman, CA 95323 | $888,862 |
125 | , | $881,618 | |
126 | Randy Lee Kiker Jr | Monroe, NC 28112 | $872,215 |
127 | Eagle Lake Farm Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $871,199 |
128 | Mark & Kelly Mccormick Joint Venture | Floydada, TX 79235 | $869,077 |
129 | Rolling Hills Ranch | Exeter, CA 93221 | $864,192 |
130 | J & J Farms | Forgan, OK 73938 | $859,109 |
131 | , | $853,600 | |
132 | Jimmy Forrest Farms Inc | Ward, SC 29166 | $850,631 |
133 | Double C Cattle Company LLC | Springer, OK 73458 | $849,936 |
134 | Wyckoff Farms Inc | Grandview, WA 98930 | $840,195 |
135 | Ring Tail R Cattle Company LLC | Rawlins, WY 82301 | $838,968 |
136 | Deline Farms South | Charleston, MO 63834 | $825,098 |
137 | Deline Farms Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $821,950 |
138 | Bee Life Fit LLC | Lehigh Acres, FL 33936 | $817,132 |
139 | Costamagna Farms No 1 | Hanford, CA 93230 | $816,203 |
140 | Hawbaker Ag LLC | Lafayette, IN 47905 | $816,088 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”