Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in the United States, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 88,039
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in the United States totaled $901,973,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Saul Minnow Farms Inc | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $302,477 |
122 | Bryan J Ashurst | Westmorland, CA 92281 | $300,298 |
123 | Joey Olivier Farms | Arnaudville, LA 70512 | $300,204 |
124 | Kathy L Ferguson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $298,906 |
125 | Amanda B Theriot | Lake Arthur, LA 70549 | $297,836 |
126 | Arapahoe Ranch | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $297,149 |
127 | Deerfield Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $296,996 |
128 | Rodney D Hulett | Gotebo, OK 73041 | $296,088 |
129 | Sleeping Bear Apiaries Ltd | Beulah, MI 49617 | $295,418 |
130 | Robert Keith Heinen | Basile, LA 70515 | $290,599 |
131 | , | $290,078 | |
132 | Chaparral Honey Inc | Valley Center, CA 92082 | $284,244 |
133 | Alan Brown | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $283,777 |
134 | Andrew Moore Inc | Umatilla, FL 32784 | $283,466 |
135 | , | $282,563 | |
136 | Reece Farms Inc. | Farwell, MN 56327 | $282,268 |
137 | Reece Industries Inc. | Lowry, MN 56349 | $282,267 |
138 | Frenchman Valley Ranch Ptnrshp | Saco, MT 59261 | $281,697 |
139 | Philip W Habeck | Moorcroft, WY 82721 | $280,988 |
140 | Jackson Land & Cattle Lp | Livermore, CA 94551 | $280,789 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”