CCC Organic Programs in the United States, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 3,576
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in the United States totaled $3,413,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Golden Prairie Inc | Nunn, CO 80648 | $1,500 |
122 | Herbal Innovations LLC | Wilkesboro, NC 28697 | $1,500 |
123 | Andrew Steven Quall | Blair, WI 54616 | $1,500 |
124 | Spring Thyme Herb Farm Inc | Hockessin, DE 19707 | $1,500 |
125 | Freeman C Miller | Goshen, IN 46528 | $1,500 |
126 | Branons West View Maples LLC | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $1,500 |
127 | Natural Milk Too LLC | Stanwood, WA 98292 | $1,500 |
128 | Christy J Graber | Lagrange, IN 46761 | $1,500 |
129 | Dekam Organics Inc | Falmouth, MI 49632 | $1,500 |
130 | Common Good Farm LLC | Raymond, NE 68428 | $1,500 |
131 | Peralta Farms LLC | Buhl, ID 83316 | $1,500 |
132 | Weller Family Farms LLC | Circleville, OH 43113 | $1,500 |
133 | Ramona's American Indian Foods, LLC | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $1,500 |
134 | Hardy Family Farm LLC | Mohawk, NY 13407 | $1,500 |
135 | Klock Family Dairy Farm, LLC | Lafargeville, NY 13656 | $1,500 |
136 | Healing Noni Co. LLC | Hilo, HI 96720 | $1,500 |
137 | Palani Farms LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $1,500 |
138 | Andrew Lafayette | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $1,500 |
139 | Triple B Corporation Dba Charlies Produce - Boise | Seattle, WA 98134 | $1,500 |
140 | James Lake Farms Inc | Three Lakes, WI 54562 | $1,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”