Water Bank Program in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 7,250
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in the United States totaled $10,623,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Drew Cotton Seed Oil Mill Inc | Monticello, AR 71657 | $7,468 |
122 | Steenberg & Huettl Inv | Fond Du Lac, WI 54936 | $7,397 |
123 | Martin Malsam | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $7,387 |
124 | Edgar Lacour Estate Partnership | Morganza, LA 70759 | $7,349 |
125 | Gerhard E Schmidt | Glenwood, MN 56334 | $7,346 |
126 | M J Breker | Rutland, ND 58067 | $7,322 |
127 | Theodore J Weispfenning | Fredonia, ND 58440 | $7,285 |
128 | Anderson Mj Gn Ptr | Branford, CT 06405 | $7,230 |
129 | E Wells Hunt Club | Wynne, AR 72396 | $7,201 |
130 | Soudan Farming Co | Marianna, AR 72360 | $7,188 |
131 | Oakhurst Company | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $7,177 |
132 | Lloyd L Binder | Leola, SD 57456 | $7,173 |
133 | J.e.johnston Estate C/o F.r. Morg | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $7,153 |
134 | Eugene Rexine | Lehr, ND 58460 | $7,136 |
135 | Doris L Kelly Estate | Coon Rapids, MN 55433 | $7,132 |
136 | Black Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,105 |
137 | Jeffrey L Walker | Villard, MN 56385 | $7,104 |
138 | Donovan Jensen | Eden, SD 57232 | $7,049 |
139 | Harold S Smith | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $6,988 |
140 | Anita Dittmer | Fosston, MN 56542 | $6,977 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”