Total Conservation Programs in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,398,976

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in the United States totaled $53,097,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
141Aageson Grain & CattleGildford, MT 59525$2,321,775
142Thompson LandHeppner, OR 97836$2,320,185
143Wandling BrothersMabton, WA 98935$2,319,589
144Ralph Johnson FarmsCut Bank, MT 59427$2,275,107
145L Y 7 CompanySanta Margarita, CA 93453$2,257,915
146C Bar Cattle CoMalta, ID 83342$2,249,499
147Weinreis BrothersScottsbluff, NE 69361$2,245,479
148Wilkerson RanchesKennewick, WA 99338$2,237,422
149M & M FarmsShelby, MT 59474$2,231,367
150Harvey & Patrice Kountz JvBrockway, MT 59214$2,229,761
151B & C Farms PartnershipCheyenne Wells, CO 80810$2,214,399
152Beachner Southwest Farming CoSaint Paul, KS 66771$2,194,766
153Mitchell-broadview LlpMalibu, CA 90265$2,186,604
154Masini InvestmentsYerington, NV 89447$2,170,375
155Klaveano Brothers JvPomeroy, WA 99347$2,169,264
156Carter FarmsMaury City, TN 38050$2,165,706
157White Ranch CompanyShandon, CA 93461$2,155,760
158Schutte Farms PartnershipBurlington, CO 80807$2,154,584
159Nebeker BrosSalt Lake City, UT 84108$2,150,311
160Premier Farm Credit Fica **Yuma, CO 80759$2,147,808

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag