Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 846,235

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in the United States totaled $17,872,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
161Fnb Of Eastern Arkansas **Forrest City, AR 72335$976,791
162Farm Credit Southeast Missouri **Poplar Bluff, MO 63901$972,471
163Taylor Farms General PartnershipAmes, NE 68621$972,356
164S & H Farms PartnershipMankato, MN 56001$971,781
165Ballantyne AgriWesthope, ND 58793$971,696
166Hord Grain & Land CompanyBucyrus, OH 44820$970,330
167J D Hirschfeld & SonsBenedict, NE 68316$969,401
168H & J Buseman FarmsBelmond, IA 50421$966,062
169Empire Land & Cattle IIDunlap, IA 51529$965,525
170Dandyland FarmsGarner, IA 50438$964,970
171Oak Prairie FarmsBronson, MI 49028$957,232
172Cottonport Bank **Mansura, LA 71350$957,196
173Likens FarmsAnderson, IN 46011$956,353
174Orville Hoffschneider & SonsWaco, NE 68460$954,663
175Truesdell Family Farm PartnershipSherburn, MN 56171$954,395
176Alfalfa FarmsSyracuse, KS 67878$953,450
177Southwest Georgia Farm Credit **Bainbridge, GA 39817$952,381
178Eastern High Plains RanchDeer Trail, CO 80105$950,133
179Cox Brothers FarmsMonroe, NC 28112$948,803
180Bryant FarmsCopeland, KS 67837$948,489

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag