Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 846,235
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in the United States totaled $17,872,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Priggel Land Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $943,140 |
182 | Middlewater Farms | Farwell, TX 79325 | $942,484 |
183 | Marc And Amie Palmer Partnership | Williamsport, OH 43164 | $934,928 |
184 | Ajb Partnership | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $934,702 |
185 | Howard Bros Farms | Junction, IL 62954 | $933,630 |
186 | Kohler Farms Partnership | Valley City, ND 58072 | $933,102 |
187 | New Hope Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $932,692 |
188 | Deiter Farms | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $932,681 |
189 | Klaveano Brothers Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $925,915 |
190 | Pederson Brothers Partnership | Bejou, MN 56516 | $923,945 |
191 | Homestead Family Farms Gp | Howardstown, KY 40051 | $923,881 |
192 | Niobrara Farms | Atkinson, NE 68713 | $923,701 |
193 | Ferebee Iv Partnership | Shawboro, NC 27973 | $922,801 |
194 | Nolin Farming Company | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $922,101 |
195 | Bigham Farms | Vergennes, IL 62994 | $918,528 |
196 | Cook Farms General Partnership | Princeton, KY 42445 | $912,521 |
197 | Pat Scates & Sons | Shawneetown, IL 62984 | $912,339 |
198 | Gilbert Farms | Germantown, OH 45327 | $910,617 |
199 | White Oak Farms | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $907,677 |
200 | Dane County Growers Ptrn | Edgerton, WI 53534 | $906,817 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”