Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 846,235

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in the United States totaled $17,872,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
181Priggel Land PartnershipOran, MO 63771$943,140
182Middlewater FarmsFarwell, TX 79325$942,484
183Marc And Amie Palmer PartnershipWilliamsport, OH 43164$934,928
184Ajb PartnershipRoscoe, SD 57471$934,702
185Howard Bros FarmsJunction, IL 62954$933,630
186Kohler Farms PartnershipValley City, ND 58072$933,102
187New Hope FarmsSchlater, MS 38952$932,692
188Deiter FarmsFaulkton, SD 57438$932,681
189Klaveano Brothers JvPomeroy, WA 99347$925,915
190Pederson Brothers PartnershipBejou, MN 56516$923,945
191Homestead Family Farms GpHowardstown, KY 40051$923,881
192Niobrara FarmsAtkinson, NE 68713$923,701
193Ferebee Iv PartnershipShawboro, NC 27973$922,801
194Nolin Farming CompanyPendleton, OR 97801$922,101
195Bigham FarmsVergennes, IL 62994$918,528
196Cook Farms General PartnershipPrinceton, KY 42445$912,521
197Pat Scates & SonsShawneetown, IL 62984$912,339
198Gilbert FarmsGermantown, OH 45327$910,617
199White Oak FarmsCloverdale, IN 46120$907,677
200Dane County Growers PtrnEdgerton, WI 53534$906,817

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag