Emergency Conservation Program in the United States, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,728
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in the United States totaled $86,378,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Daniel K Hoffman | Marion, IA 52302 | $214,678 |
42 | Rose Brown | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $213,596 |
43 | Willard E Ruzicka | Verdigre, NE 68783 | $210,236 |
44 | Sugar Hill Farm Inc | Fort Smith, AR 72917 | $204,301 |
45 | John Bridges Farm Gp | Brinson, GA 39825 | $202,575 |
46 | Rowdy E Barry | Kennewick, WA 99337 | $200,000 |
47 | South Naples Citrus Grove | Naples, FL 34114 | $200,000 |
48 | Marquez Farms LLC | Homestead, FL 33031 | $200,000 |
49 | United Nursery LLC | Homestead, FL 33030 | $200,000 |
50 | R A Atmore & Sons Inc Dba Foothill Weed Abatement | Ventura, CA 93003 | $200,000 |
51 | Manuel Diaz Farms Inc | Homestead, FL 33032 | $200,000 |
52 | Acosta Farms Inc | Miami, FL 33197 | $200,000 |
53 | Alpha Foliage Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $200,000 |
54 | 3rt Farms | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $199,489 |
55 | Rr&e Pecans LLC | Bainbridge, GA 39818 | $196,174 |
56 | Lnb Groves Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $190,610 |
57 | Wayne Johnson Farms | Spickard, MO 64679 | $185,648 |
58 | Ninety-six Ranch, LLC | Paradise Vly, NV 89426 | $182,658 |
59 | Michael Werner | Clarksville, AR 72830 | $181,740 |
60 | Anthony Ruzicka | Verdigre, NE 68783 | $180,983 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”