Emergency Conservation Program in the United States, 2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,446

Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in the United States totaled $102,052,000 in in 2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Conservation Program
2023
1, $500,000
2Rincon Farms IncGonzales, CA 93926$500,000
3Galt Ranch LpWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$500,000
4, $453,445
5Johnson Sheep And Cattle LLCBelle Fourche, SD 57717$413,020
6, $406,268
7Oddie HubbardWoodstock, AL 35188$382,386
8, $375,148
9Benito Valley Farms Inc.Hollister, CA 95023$360,342
10Lx Cattle CompanyAmarillo, TX 79105$322,666
11Mielke Brothers GpDavenport, WA 99122$311,524
12Edward C AbrahamCanadian, TX 79014$307,989
13Terry L HalvorsonMadison, MN 56256$297,686
14Tdn FarmsLewis, KS 67552$296,643
15, $286,213
16John StineMooreland, OK 73852$285,942
17Platte River Basin Environments IncScottsbluff, NE 69363$274,627
18John D MoitozoGustine, CA 95322$272,314
19Mhw Enterprises IncSylvan Grove, KS 67481$263,384
20Melvin AmbroseMaupin, OR 97037$260,497

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag