Sugar Beet Subsidies in the United States, 1995-2020‡
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,071
Recipients of Sugar Beet Subsidies from farms in the United States totaled $242,064,000 in from 1995-2020‡.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Sugar Beet Subsidies 1995-2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skaurud Grain Farms * | Gary, MN 56545 | $278,527 |
| 2 | Sanders Farms * | Burley, ID 83318 | $250,914 |
| 3 | Hector Farms II Partnership * | Hector, MN 55342 | $248,936 |
| 4 | Stoltman Farms * | Argyle, MN 56713 | $204,890 |
| 5 | Krogstad Farms Ptsp * | Hatton, ND 58240 | $197,960 |
| 6 | Prosser/kuznia Jv * | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $164,150 |
| 7 | Ball Bros * | Paul, ID 83347 | $160,354 |
| 8 | Valley Creek Farms * | Tipton, CA 93272 | $159,106 |
| 9 | Pederson Brothers Partnership * | Bejou, MN 56516 | $158,068 |
| 10 | Driscoll Brothers * | Pocatello, ID 83201 | $153,733 |
| 11 | Belle Acres Ptnr * | Alliance, NE 69301 | $148,487 |
| 12 | P & W Farms * | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $146,908 |
| 13 | Thompson Farms Partnership * | Pingree, ID 83262 | $139,154 |
| 14 | Newton Brothers * | Paul, ID 83347 | $137,578 |
| 15 | Dahl Brothers * | Glyndon, MN 56547 | $132,686 |
| 16 | Vipond Farms * | Norcross, MN 56274 | $129,712 |
| 17 | Black Bell Farms * | Twin Valley, MN 56584 | $128,860 |
| 18 | Larry Eliason | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $127,805 |
| 19 | Stoltman Farms-rogalla Jv * | Argyle, MN 56713 | $121,914 |
| 20 | M J Renquist & Sons Gen Ptnrship * | Aurora, CO 80016 | $120,573 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf