Lamb Meat Adjustment Program in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 34,132
Recipients of Lamb Meat Adjustment Program from farms in the United States totaled $86,221,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Lamb Meat Adjustment Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Oxarango Lamb & Wool | Rupert, ID 83350 | $147,062 |
| 42 | Pedro Ma Indacochea | Wildomar, CA 92595 | $146,896 |
| 43 | Frischknecht Livestock | Gunnison, UT 84634 | $140,631 |
| 44 | Sam Etchegaray Sr | Visalia, CA 93279 | $138,782 |
| 45 | Joseph Auza Sheep Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $137,810 |
| 46 | Emilio Calzada | Fresno, CA 93777 | $135,431 |
| 47 | R Larson Sheep Co | Ephraim, UT 84627 | $135,168 |
| 48 | Drake Livestock Co LLC | Windsor, CO 80550 | $134,804 |
| 49 | David Dalling | Hamer, ID 83425 | $134,302 |
| 50 | Jrb LLC | Salt Lake City, UT 84158 | $133,668 |
| 51 | Roderick A Mckenzie | Langlois, OR 97450 | $133,495 |
| 52 | Martin R Auza | Brawley, CA 92227 | $132,138 |
| 53 | Jean B Etchebehere | Lemoore, CA 93245 | $130,845 |
| 54 | Robert & June Burk | Del Rio, TX 78841 | $128,196 |
| 55 | Dwight Childress | Ozona, TX 76943 | $127,772 |
| 56 | Swift Beef Company | Greeley, CO 80634 | $126,745 |
| 57 | Lawrence Wahl | Albany, OR 97322 | $126,483 |
| 58 | Yellow Rose Lamb Co | Gooding, ID 83330 | $124,971 |
| 59 | Vip Livestock Company Vip Ranch Co % Pierce Miller | San Angelo, TX 76902 | $123,994 |
| 60 | A & F Sheep Company | Bakersfield, CA 93388 | $123,676 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf