Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 846,235

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in the United States totaled $17,872,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
1Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$14,458,705
2Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$13,015,681
3Agcountry Farm Credit Services **Jamestown, ND 58402$12,080,376
4NapiFarmington, NM 87499$8,166,157
5Capital Farm Credit **El Campo, TX 77437$4,148,317
6H Bar H Farms GpDalhart, TX 79022$3,563,632
7Bank Forward **Cooperstown, ND 58425$3,525,079
8Beacon Credit Union **Wabash, IN 46992$3,478,621
9Prosperity Bank **El Campo, TX 77437$2,996,475
10First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$2,925,749
11Banknorth **Arthur, ND 58006$2,916,578
12Deline Farms PartnershipCharleston, MO 63834$2,825,704
13Agtexas Fcs **Brownfield, TX 79316$2,742,128
14Hader Farms PartnershipZumbrota, MN 55992$2,663,205
15Choice Financial Group **Langdon, ND 58249$2,512,127
16Yackley RanchesOnida, SD 57564$2,496,285
17Ag PartnersGruver, TX 79040$2,472,273
18Molitor Bros FarmCannon Falls, MN 55009$2,424,011
19Pioneer Bank **Saint James, MN 56081$2,229,824
20Niewohner Farming EnterpriseAlbion, NE 68620$2,219,683

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag