Total Disaster Programs in the United States, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 358,782
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in the United States totaled $5,276,000,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $6,127,773 |
2 | Rickie Simmons & Son Tropical Fis | Ruskin, FL 33570 | $4,251,816 |
3 | Neal Cattle Company,llc | Purcell, OK 73080 | $4,208,868 |
4 | Modesto Reservoir Ranch | Hughson, CA 95326 | $3,811,198 |
5 | David Britz Linda Britz Glassman & Martin Britz Pt | Fresno, CA 93790 | $3,475,000 |
6 | Heard Family Farm | Brinson, GA 39825 | $3,307,864 |
7 | Imperial Tropicals | Lakeland, FL 33805 | $2,844,842 |
8 | Castle Rock Land & Livestock | North Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $2,744,785 |
9 | R&g Fish, LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $2,637,542 |
10 | Lindskov Ranch Gen Ptr | Isabel, SD 57633 | $2,455,286 |
11 | Urban Tropical Inc | Lakeland, FL 33810 | $2,377,157 |
12 | , | $2,327,566 | |
13 | , | $2,231,648 | |
14 | David Daniel Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93314 | $2,196,615 |
15 | Sukhraj Pamma Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $2,165,495 |
16 | Mill Point Aquaculture | Sealevel, NC 28577 | $2,083,760 |
17 | , | $2,068,410 | |
18 | Reed L & Lynn Y Bowers Bowers Shrimp Farm | Palacios, TX 77465 | $2,064,987 |
19 | Jesse Wiggins Farms LLC | Center, TX 75935 | $2,052,907 |
20 | Arrowsmith & Sons Apiaries Inc. | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $2,046,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>