Total Commodity Programs in the United States, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,095,270
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in the United States totaled $34,015,000,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $9,305,721 |
22 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $9,275,123 |
23 | Southern Bancorp Bank ** | Trumann, AR 72472 | $9,260,000 |
24 | First National Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72451 | $8,956,577 |
25 | Aimbank ** | Plains, TX 79355 | $8,815,779 |
26 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $8,790,874 |
27 | Independence Bank ** | Havre, MT 59501 | $8,730,197 |
28 | Lone Star State Bank Of West Texa ** | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $7,990,589 |
29 | Merchants & Planters Bank ** | Newport, AR 72112 | $7,797,123 |
30 | Farmers & Merchants Bank ** | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,717,061 |
31 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $7,377,420 |
32 | Peoples Bank ** | Lorenzo, TX 79343 | $7,348,771 |
33 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $7,279,322 |
34 | Happy State Bank ** | Dumas, TX 79029 | $7,115,037 |
35 | Guaranty Bank & Trust Co ** | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $7,044,270 |
36 | Titan Swine | Ireton, IA 51027 | $6,994,494 |
37 | Cross County Bank ** | Wynne, AR 72396 | $6,940,256 |
38 | Commercial Capital Bank ** | Delhi, LA 71232 | $6,826,554 |
39 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $6,610,556 |
40 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $6,590,573 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”