SELECT * FROM na_mtotal WHERE fips='00000' AND progcode='totalwhip ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) in the United States, 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 14,671

Recipients of Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) from farms in the United States totaled $86,869,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP)
1995-2020
1Rhode Island Country Club *Barrington, RI 02806$421,888
2The Nature Conservancy *Minneapolis, MN 55415$413,639
3Babbitt Ranches LLCFlagstaff, AZ 86002$412,082
4Gerald G ScanlanMalin, OR 97632$408,544
5Jerry R EvansPrineville, OR 97754$387,216
6Nat Trop Botanical GardKalaheo, Kauai, HI 96741$325,957
7Sea Lion CorporationHooper Bay, AK 99604$324,588
8R R & K Kramme RlllpWillcox, AZ 85643$299,200
9Mass Audubon Society *Lincoln, MA 01773$262,059
10Terry G BlissCarpinteria, CA 93013$250,000
11Wilford C Senn Dba Covered S Ranc *Snyder, TX 79549$249,977
12Sealaska CorporationJuneau, AK 99801$249,627
13National Audubon Society *Fargo, ND 58102$242,590
14Delaware Wildlands Inc *Odessa, DE 19730$234,842
15Yc&r Limited PartnershipMesa, AZ 85277$233,078
16Clyde PhillipsSalmon, ID 83467$208,729
17Connecticut Coll ArboretumNew London, CT 06320$207,313
18Paul J ErkNewell, SD 57760$198,692
19J E ShortCoeur D Alene, ID 83816$198,080
20Hopi Three Canyon Ranch LLC *Winslow, AZ 86047$192,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag