Farm Subsidy information
Alabama
Total Subsidies in Alabama, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 6,724
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alabama totaled $117,839,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lee Jackson | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $165,496 |
22 | Jered N Mathis | Newton, AL 36352 | $165,009 |
23 | Rachell Penton | Verbena, AL 36091 | $159,023 |
24 | Quinco Farm | Chatom, AL 36518 | $157,940 |
25 | Todd L Wakefield | Aliceville, AL 35442 | $154,227 |
26 | B & C Catfish Farms Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $152,625 |
27 | John A Knight | Leesburg, AL 35983 | $149,937 |
28 | Dean Wilson Farm LLC | Marion Junction, AL 36759 | $147,581 |
29 | Charles P Vaughan III Dba Vaughan Farms | Florence, AL 35633 | $147,377 |
30 | Middleton Farms | Mobile, AL 36608 | $144,172 |
31 | Poarch Band Of Creek Indians | Atmore, AL 36502 | $144,068 |
32 | Armstrong Farms Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $139,827 |
33 | George R Jeffcoat | Gordon, AL 36343 | $136,089 |
34 | John W Solomon Farms Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $134,954 |
35 | Gaines Farm | Autaugaville, AL 36003 | $132,856 |
36 | Adam Peterman | Dothan, AL 36301 | $131,699 |
37 | Prairie Lakes Farm Inc | Greensboro, AL 36744 | $131,424 |
38 | S & B Farms | Samson, AL 36477 | $125,000 |
39 | , | $125,000 | |
40 | G R Beers III Farms Inc | Tyler, AL 36785 | $122,848 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”