Total Commodity Programs in Alabama, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,117
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Alabama totaled $19,931,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Beasley Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $92,792 |
22 | Alabama Ag Credit Aca ** | Monroeville, AL 36461 | $91,704 |
23 | Wiggins Farm | Andalusia, AL 36420 | $83,156 |
24 | Cooper Farm | Clayton, AL 36016 | $80,286 |
25 | Five Points Farming Partnership | Coffee Springs, AL 36318 | $79,444 |
26 | Ingalls Farms | Ashford, AL 36312 | $79,194 |
27 | Big Creek Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $75,988 |
28 | Thomas Kirkland Farm | Headland, AL 36345 | $74,558 |
29 | River Road Farms Inc | Gordon, AL 36343 | $73,912 |
30 | Timothy W Lassiter | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $73,310 |
31 | Charles Jeff Mccallister | Gordon, AL 36343 | $71,466 |
32 | Byrd Farms | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $71,097 |
33 | Bristow Farms Partnership | Columbia, AL 36319 | $70,992 |
34 | Clay Ellenburg Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $68,434 |
35 | Julio Corte III Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $68,409 |
36 | Kaiser Farms Inc | Elberta, AL 36530 | $66,999 |
37 | Parkerhill Farms | Taylor, AL 36301 | $66,669 |
38 | , | $65,625 | |
39 | Adams Farms Partnership | Newville, AL 36353 | $65,542 |
40 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $65,316 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”