Total Commodity Programs in Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 59,395
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Alabama totaled $2,877,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Segrest Farms | Shorter, AL 36075 | $4,514,579 |
42 | Letson Brothers Farms | Hillsboro, AL 35643 | $4,464,987 |
43 | Petelinski Brothers | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $4,462,523 |
44 | Herman Rochester & Sons | Leesburg, AL 35983 | $4,437,039 |
45 | Moravec Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $4,410,111 |
46 | Byrd Farms | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $4,396,136 |
47 | Shipes Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $4,321,945 |
48 | D C Farms | Samson, AL 36477 | $4,290,035 |
49 | Brooks Farm | Atmore, AL 36502 | $4,260,969 |
50 | George Jeffcoat Farms-03 | Gordon, AL 36343 | $4,248,424 |
51 | Mcnatt Farms | Elkmont, AL 35620 | $4,114,978 |
52 | Barron Farms | Athens, AL 35611 | $4,092,610 |
53 | Marsh Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $4,092,391 |
54 | Shaw Farms | Tanner, AL 35671 | $4,039,330 |
55 | Lecroix Farms | Belle Mina, AL 35615 | $3,854,737 |
56 | Atkinson Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $3,805,908 |
57 | Grant Brothers | Uriah, AL 36480 | $3,787,127 |
58 | Roger Martin Farms | Madison, AL 35757 | $3,771,186 |
59 | Hobbs Farms | Elkmont, AL 35620 | $3,665,816 |
60 | Moseley Farm | Leroy, AL 36548 | $3,625,369 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”