Conservation Reserve Program in Alabama, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,488
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Alabama totaled $6,268,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Garrett E Carstarphen | Montgomery, AL 36106 | $12,450 |
62 | William Slade Rhodes Jr | Montgomery, AL 36111 | $12,403 |
63 | Tommie W Logan | Dothan, AL 36303 | $12,368 |
64 | John R Langford Family Limited Partnership | Daytona Beach, FL 32117 | $12,363 |
65 | Epes LLC | Tuscaloosa, AL 35403 | $12,306 |
66 | June O Stinson | Evergreen, AL 36401 | $12,288 |
67 | Nell T Burt | Montgomery, AL 36117 | $12,284 |
68 | River Bluff Farm LLC | Hartford, AL 36344 | $12,262 |
69 | Charles S Harris | Uriah, AL 36480 | $12,253 |
70 | David R Parkman Jr | Seale, AL 36875 | $12,181 |
71 | Bobbi O Royster | Mc Kenzie, AL 36456 | $12,181 |
72 | Snead Family Partnership Ltd | Boaz, AL 35956 | $11,905 |
73 | Belle Mina Farm Ltd | Belle Mina, AL 35615 | $11,892 |
74 | Mitchell Family Enterprises LLC | Mathews, AL 36052 | $11,880 |
75 | Robert Morrow | Russellville, AL 35653 | $11,821 |
76 | Burch Farms LLC | Moulton, AL 35650 | $11,677 |
77 | Stella B Sykes | Tuscaloosa, AL 35402 | $11,568 |
78 | Susie B Byrd | Frisco City, AL 36445 | $11,361 |
79 | , | $11,266 | |
80 | Mary Goldman | Livingston, AL 35470 | $11,232 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”